[ad_1]
US District Judge James Boasberg in Washington ruled his temporary order will remain in effect, restricting such removals until the men are given an opportunity to challenge whether they are connected to the Tren de Aragua gang. The ruling came hours before a federal appeals court will hear arguments on the issue.
âEach vehemently denies being a member of Tren de Aragua,â the judge said in a ruling Monday. âSeveral in fact claim that they fled Venezuela to escape the predations of the group, and they fear grave consequences if deported solely because of the Governmentâs unchallenged labeling.â
The ruling is the latest development in a growing rift between the judiciary and executive branches over the extent of President Donald Trumpâs power to invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which applies when the US is in a state of âdeclared warâ or suffering an âinvasion or predatory incursion.â After Boasberg issued his TROs, Trump called for the judge to be impeached, prompting a rare rebuke of the president by US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
Boasberg has been critical of the government for allowing some accused gang members to be deported despite his ruling temporarily blocking them, demanding answers about when exactly the planes took off any why they didnât turn around. In his ruling Monday, the judge said that the âmost reasonable inferenceâ is that the government âhustled people onto those planes in the hopes of evading an injunction or perhaps preventing them from requesting the habeas hearing to which the government now acknowledges they are entitled.â
Boasberg, however, said the order doesnât prevent the Trump administration from detaining or deporting suspected members of the violent Tren de Aragua gang under the Immigration and Nationality Act as members of a foreign terrorist organization, or FTO.
âThe noncitizens comprising the class are already in United States custody, and any actual Tren de Aragua member is already subject to deportation as a member of an FTO, so there is little additional harm to the public by temporarily preventing their removal,â the judge wrote.
Lawyers for the US Justice Department have argued that Trumpâs invocation of the Alien Enemies Act canât be reviewed by the courts, but Boasberg said he doesnât need to resolve that âthorny questionâ at this stage.
âThat is because plaintiffs are likely to succeed on another equally fundamental theory: before they may be deported, they are entitled to individualized hearings to determine whether the Act applies to them at all,â the judge said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
[ad_2]
Source link
