India has held off the Indus Waters Treaty with due legitimacy

[ad_1] While ‘abeyance’ lacks a formal status in international law, the closest corresponding legal concept is ‘suspension’ under Article 62 (1) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). It recognizes a change in circumstances as a valid but narrowly constructed ground for suspending or terminating treaty obligations if: (a) the change is…

Read More

The impact of suspending a water treaty

[ad_1] In a strong measure against Pakistan, after terrorists from The Resistance Front killed 26 tourists in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, India’s Cabinet Committee on Security decided that “the Indus Waters Treaty [IWT] of 1960 will be held in abeyance with immediate effect, until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism”….

Read More

Mint Explainer: India puts Indus Waters Treaty on ice—what’s at stake for both sides

[ad_1] The decision, made after a meeting of India’s Cabinet Committee on Security on Wednesday, comes in response to the Pahalgam attack, which left 26 people dead. Read this | Terror strike throws blanket of gloom over Kashmir’s tourism landscape Mint unpacks how India’s move reframes water as a strategic tool, explores the legal arguments…

Read More
Back To Top