The momentum has continued to grow in recent months, with institutions such as the University of Surrey, Queenâs University Belfast, and Coventry University announcing plans to establish campuses. Australiaâs Western Sydney University is reportedly exploring a presence in Noida, near Delhi.
In another landmark move, the Illinois Institute of Technology recently received formal approval from the UGC to establish a campus in Mumbai, making it the first U.S. university to receive such authorisation. The University of Western Australia has also signalled its intention to open campuses in Tamil Nadu as well as Maharashtra. All these developments mark a significant turning point in Indiaâs higher education sector.
Deakin and Wollongong, which already began classes last year, and the University of Southampton, which is going to welcome its first batch of students this academic year, have moved ahead quickly, too quick perhaps. While this rapid pace may signal strong intent and enthusiasm, it also raises many concerns.
Challenges to the âbranchâ idea
Globally, transnational education is navigating an increasingly uncertain landscape. This may be one of the most difficult global environments for universities to establish branches. The country with the largest number of overseas university branches globally, the U.S., is in complete disarray due to the attacks on higher education from the Trump administration. The last thing on the minds of most American university leaders are foreign initiatives. Therefore, the Illinois Institute of Technologyâs decision to establish a campus in India should be seen only as a rare exception in the current landscape.
The other major English-speaking countriesâthe UK, Australia, and Canadaâall face severe financial challenges. European universities may be more interested.
Even institutions willing to enter the Indian market will have to overcome numerous domestic challenges. A major issue for foreign university branch campuses entering India is navigating Indiaâs highly competitive higher education landscape. While foreign branch campuses may carry significant prestige in their home countries, most of the foreign institutions seeking to enter the Indian market are not top schools in their own countries. In India, they risk being seen as just one among several âeliteâ options available to students.
These branch campuses follow a market-driven model, offering programmes in high-demand fields such as Business, Computer Science, and Data Analytics. While this approach may be financially strategic, the narrow academic focus risks making them indistinguishable from Indiaâs better-performing private colleges and universities, which already offer similar programmes.
Therefore, the real challenge is not merely to meet demand, but to establish a clear academic identity. Without this, they risk being perceived as little more than diploma mills, ultimately undermining the reputation of the very universities they represent. It is also relevant that most of the branches already established or planning to be established are not comprehensive universities with diverse offerings and research focus, but rather are small specialised schools.
India already boasts renowned public institutions such as the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) and Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs), which are actively expanding their global engagement and research capabilities. Notable collaborationsâlike IIT Delhi with the University of Queensland and IIT Bombay with Monash Universityâhave set strong precedents for international research partnerships. Furthermore, a growing number of elite and semi-elite private universities in India now offer joint and double degree programs in collaboration with foreign institutions. In this dynamic environment, foreign branch campuses cannot rely solely on the strength of their international brand.
No substitute for substance
A concerning trend among some international branch campuses already established in India is their disproportionate reliance on marketing strategiesâdigital campaigns and branding exercisesâoften at the expense of academic investment. While marketing has its place, it cannot substitute for substance. Todayâs students and parents are increasingly discerning. They closely examine publicly available information on faculty credentials, curriculum design, industry relevance, and student support systems. Flashy campaigns without academic depth or meaningful student engagement will not build lasting trust.
Another key problem lies in student perception, and the reality, of campus life. Early observations suggest that most of these branch campuses operate out of vertical buildings, often renting space. While such structures may offer operational efficiency, they often lack the vibrancy, openness, and spatial identity characteristic of traditional Indian universitiesâcampuses with adequate green spaces and sports fields for example. If foreign universities wish to be perceived as full-fledged institutionsâand not merely as product-oriented training centresâthey must invest in essential âsoftâ infrastructure as well.
Need for local relevance
From the Indian perspective, selecting the right partner is important. Universities from the Global North typically are interested in branch campuses for several reasons. Host countries or institutions may offer major incentives in terms of facilities or fundsâas seen in Qatar. In many cases, the primary motivation is to earn money as illustrated by several branches in Dubai.
Some wish to establish a presence in a country to recruit students to the home campus. Many branch campuses are small, specialised schools or faculties, and seldom full-fledged campuses, and very few have a strong research program. Without major incentives, top global universities will seldom be attracted. In all cases, India would need to very carefully evaluate whether a particular branch proposal is suitable to local needs, and is the type of foreign institution that is attractiveâcareful vetting will be important.
The establishment of foreign university branch campuses in India marks a significant milestone in the countryâs higher education landscape. However, if these ventures are rushed or poorly managed, they risk becoming cautionary talesâshort-lived initiatives that erode trust, dilute brand value, and stall the broader momentum toward meaningful internationalisation.
(Philip G Altbach is professor emeritus and distinguished fellow, Center for International Higher Education, Boston College, United States. Eldho Mathews is programme officer (internationalisation) at the Kerala State Higher Education Council, India)
Feel free to email us your suggestions and feedback on education to education@thehindu.co.in
Published – May 13, 2025 09:16 pm IST